Select Page

Amazon vs future groups, why this case lead to Delhi High Court

Amazon vs future groups, why this case lead to Delhi High Court

Kishore Biyani-led Future Retail’s Rs 24,713 crore deal to sell its retail, wholesale, logistics, and warehousing units to Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Retail and Fashion style, has run into legal trouble with global e-commerce giant Amazon claiming its “contractual rights” have been violated. So what is this future and Reliance deal?


This year, Biyani’s Future Group entered into an agreement with Reliance Retail, a subsidiary of the umbrella Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) group, to sell its retail, wholesale, logistics, and warehousing to the latter. As a part of the deal, Future Retail will sell its supermarket chain Big Bazaar, premium food supply unit Food hall, and fashion and clothes supermarket Brand Factory’s retail as well as wholesale units to Reliance Retail.

The Future group was under immense pressure from its lenders, led by the State Bank of India, to manage its debt and the deal in seen as a bid by the group to cut down on the same. Before the August sale to Reliance, Biyani had been wooing several business groups to sell shares in several companies of Future Group in an attempt to cut down on the debt but had not seen much success.
Following the nationwide lockdown in March, to contain the spread of Covid-19, the retail business of Future Group had come under more stress. Sales in many of its premium food sales arm Food hall and Brand Factory had come to a near halt in the lockdown, which lasted more than two months.


Last year, Biyani’s Future Retail had signed another deal with global e-commerce giant Amazon. As part of the deal, Amazon had acquired a 49 per cent stake in Future Coupons, the promoter firm of Future Retail in a deal worth nearly Rs 2,000 crore. While Future Retail would be able to place its products on Amazon’s online marketplace, the two had also agreed that the Future Retaills products would also be a part of Amazon’s new plan, which intended to deliver products in select cities within two hours of a customer ordering them. Future Retails has more than 1,500 stores pan India.

The deal had also given Amazon a ‘call’ option, which enabled it to exercise the option of acquiring all or part of Future Coupon’s promoter, Future Retail’s shareholding in the company, within 3-10 years of the agreement. After Future’s agreement with Reliance, Amazon said the deal was a violation of a non-compete clause and a right-of-first-refusal pact it had signed with the Future Group. The deal also required Future Group to inform Amazon before entering into any sale agreement with third parties. On its part, the Future Group has said that it had not sold any stake in the company, and was merely selling its assets and had therefore not violated any terms of the contract.

Along these lines, Amazon also sent a letter to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) asking them not to approve the Future-Reliance deal as there was an interim stay order on the same. Asking the agencies to take note of the stay order, Amazon learned to have said that if the deal went ahead, it would show companies across the world that orders by reputed tribunals such as the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) were not respected in India.


Biyani-led Future Group has always maintained that it has done no wrong as far as the deal with Amazon is concerned. The company has also asserted that its deal with Reliance Retail will go forward as planned and according to the scheduled. In an update to the stock exchanges on Sunday, Future Retail, while reiterating these things, also said that the contentions raised by Amazon were “entirely misconceived”. The company in fact went on to say that it was a “bit rich” for Amazon to make the argument that Future Retail was misleading its shareholders, given the fact that it is not even a shareholder of the company.
Amazon’s letter is motivated by other considerations,” Future Retail alleged in the update it sent to exchanges.


Having obtained an interim stay from the SIAC, Amazon has won the first round on this sparring. But the fight is far from over. While Future believes that it has done no wrong, it has nonetheless set aside Rs 1,000 crore in an escrow account to factor in all present and future liabilities in its arbitration tussle with global e-commerce major Amazon.

The company is moved to the Delhi High Court seeking an express approval from Indian courts to go ahead with the deal since it believes that the interim order passed by the emergency arbitrator of the SIAC holds no value under Indian laws. If Future-Reliance decides to go ahead with the drain in spite of the interim order, it is likely to push Amazon to move the arbitration tribunal in Singapore once again to seek a final stay on the issue until the matter is heard and disposed of by it.

Checkout more such content at:

About The Author

Praveen Yadav

19 | Bibliophile and quaint | Full-Time Coder, Occasional Writer | Analytical Journalist at NDTV | Political and Psychological

Leave a Reply


Recent Comments

error: Content is protected !!

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This