Select Page

UNSC Meet on Maritime Security

UNSC Meet on Maritime Security

Recently, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has adopted the first-ever presidential statement on maritime security. India, as the UNSC president for August 2021, noticed the dangers to oceanic wellbeing and security and called upon the individuals to consider executing the 2000 UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. All the permanent members of the UNSC (US, China, Russia, UK, and France) attended the Meet.

PM Modi focused on the four elements of the way to deal with manage the difficulties. In the first place, he showed that the seas are “our common worldwide lodge” and a lifesaver of global exchange. Second, he called for eliminating obstructions to real sea exchange that can undermine the worldwide economy, while suggesting that countries ought to follow the vision set somewhere near India of “Safety and Growth for All in the Region” (SAGAR) through which it expects to make a comprehensive system for oceanic security in its area. Third, the worldwide questions ought to be settled calmly and as per global law (UNCLOS), as was finished by India in its sea limit debate with Bangladesh (despite the fact that the decision conflicted with India). Fourth, he focused on the requirement for worldwide participation to counter the dangers from normal perils and non-State entertainers and brought up that India had been a person on call during tornadoes, torrents, and contamination-related oceanic fiascos. He likewise pushed for the preservation of the sea climate and marine assets, more noteworthy common collaboration in sea science research, and a capable oceanic network, focusing on that worldwide standards and norms ought to be produced for foundation projects pointed toward boosting sea trade.

Russian President Putin upheld the Indian perspective reflecting intermingling in their methodologies. Calling attention to the Russian arrangement in such a manner, President Putin expressed that ‘his country promotes strict adherence to key norms and principles, such as respect for sovereignty, non-intervention in internal affairs and peaceful dispute settlement through dialogue’.

The US highlighted that China has been building military bases on artificial islands in the region also claimed by Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The US also referred to the unanimous and legally binding decision five years ago by the arbitral tribunal constituted under the UNCLOS which China firmly rejected as unlawful.

China held that with the joint efforts of China and ASEAN countries, the situation in the South China Sea remains generally stable. Further, China criticizes the US that it is not qualified to make irresponsible remarks on the issue of the South China Sea because the US itself has not joined the UNCLOS.

The UK has a vision for a free, open, and secure Indo-Pacific. In this context, the UK’s recent Integrated Review of Foreign, Security, Defence, and Development policy set out the importance it attaches to the Indo-Pacific.

France held that the maritime domain has emerged as a theatre for a new generation of challenges and urged greater cooperation among the members of the UNSC to deal with the issue. Such as, combating climate change and its consequences on security, particularly in terms of natural disasters.

The meet was significant. Notwithstanding China, all others focused on the centrality of UNCLOS and worldwide participation. India’s idea of SAGAR and its vision of Indo-Pacific is getting more noteworthy adequacy. Countries acknowledge that the target ought to be advancement for all. The assembly of Russia and India is critical. While Russia knows about the pressure filling in the South China Sea, it is additionally worried that none ought to upset the essential equilibrium in the Arctic. China needs to settle on a decision whether it wishes to go about as a dependable and develop the country and acknowledge the worldwide laws or would keep on mocking them by keeping on pursuing its expansionist methodology of the 19th Century, which can create extreme kickback. It could be added that in the twentieth century, twice expansionist forces were effectively checked.

Checkout more such content at:

About The Author

Nikhil Thakur

Editor @magazinegogo

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This